newest issue!
home
about nar
our mission
back issues
the staff
submissions
contacting us
 
A Short Definition of Good(and Evil)

by Robert L. Jackson III

In a world that can be described by human language and beliefs, but in reality is unknown as to it’s truths and inner workings(if any), good and evil seems to be a conjured idea of human kind. I have found that in reality there is no absolute good or absolute evil, but actions and occurrences which either coincide with the natural flow of the universe and those that contradict it. This natural flow does have to be any organized system, for it could be pure chaos and we are simply the result of random occurrences. Even creation and destruction cannot be classified as good or evil because there is destruction which replenishes or brings new possibilities and there is creation which absorbs obstacles in the way. Creation often causes the loss of many beautiful and natural things; For instance, the creation of our modern society has caused the loss of many animal species. Perhaps modern society did not cause the extinction directly, but nevertheless the natural world was certainly affected by or catalyzed by mankind’s construction and machining of the world. But this also cannot be categorized as being good or evil since perhaps it was natural order that these creatures left the Earth simply because they were no longer meant for it, as perhaps the dinosaurs were. Many aspects and actions of the world have been categorized in an almost stereotypical fashion. For example, creation has always been seen as a pure action which can only result in good.

The perspective from which these rights and wrongs are viewed can also change their classification dramatically. As the old saying goes, ‘ there are two sides to every story,’ and thus two goods and two evils according to each side. But in the intricate workings of human relations internal and external of the human race there are often many ‘sides’ and thus many ideals. Since the complexity of any situation is large, the possible perspectives are endless.

If I were to define the classification of ‘good’ I would say that it is anything that helps humankind become more realized in a position that is natural or coincides with the forces of the universe. But who is able to truly understand the complex system that is existence? Our laws and accepted ideals are just descriptions which allow us to predict and have a rational position in the world. That description of the behavior of the world, of the interaction between humans and nature, and also between human and human, whether it be love, hate, acceptance, engineering or philosophy, is what makes up society. It is what society seems to either have crafted or has been built upon.

There are many sides to the relation humans have with the rest of the universe, and the more extensive these relationships are, the more distant we are from natural existence. But since we are part of nature as well, perhaps we are not distancing ourselves from it, but rather following it as humankind should. It could be that everything that occurs due to man or anything else is a form of natural existence. If so, no matter what we do can be classified as being good, or in having some sort of positive effect on society, and then the rest of existence.

If everything happens in concurrence with and as part of the natural world, then how are we to decide how to govern ourselves? Even though everything which occurs will have some meaning, for us as human beings, some actions may be more pleasant than others. These actions may just be more directly parallel with whatever direction humankind or the universe is taking. It is important then that we be in touch with our own existence and natural direction since it may reveal the direction of the system we are a part of. If we thus follow our spirit than we shall have productive lives. The mystery is now whether or not this spirit is innate, learned or both. That is a whole other discussion in itself.

So if this parallel relationship we have with our contemporary world is what defines a ‘good’ relationship, does that mean ways which are opposite or perpendicular are ‘evil’? But how can anything be opposite, because it all occurs as part of the larger universe. So if anything is classified as evil, then everything is evil, and the universe is as well. This is how it seems there can be no good or evil, or everything would be both. Maybe existence is some twisted combination of the two, or as said before, maybe there is no organization(chaos)..

In reality though, our societies use of Good and Evil may allow for a society which is close as it can be to natural order without total regression. Many of our values support individual freedom and free thought. Of course, everyone has their own idea of freedom. We also condone actions of people which may limit someone else’s society given right to live. There are many faults in the structure though, and I do feel that maybe sometimes we should attempt to focus on what may result from the way we live our lives and also on the way we live everyday. I think we should be listening more to one’s gut feelings and whatever, if any, innate human guidance that exist rather than always following without question the accepted reasoning of society. In other words, we all should try actually thinking about something rather than blindly accepting it.



Back to Heaven





North Avenue Review
A Georgia Tech Publication.